Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Carrie's avatar

A friend of mine who has done work in developing clothing patterns and designs for industrial production tells me that the allowable margin for acceptable finished variation is 2". That is, if you are making a size 10 and the waist is supposed to finish at 30", it's acceptable if it ends up between 29" and 31". The gradation between sizes is typically 2": if you look at a sizing chart, a lot of them will have size measurements that go 28", 30", 32", 34", etc.

So if the acceptable variation is 2" and the difference between sizing is 2" it's very possible to find that you fit into two of the exact same garment from the same company but one is a size 16 and one is a size 18, or whatever.

Expand full comment
Carrie's avatar

I think it's also important to note that women's bodies don't scale in the same way men's do. If you disregard variations in the midsection for a moment, a much larger percentage of men have very similar proportions between neck, chest, and hip circumferences. Women? All over the place. Boobs! for one thing. They can be big, small, high, low, differently shaped, in a totally different relationship to armholes and ribcage. Two women can be size 12 and if a dress is drafted for a C cup, it's going to look awful on an A cup even if everything "fits". It's generally not possible to take a nicely fitting pattern for a straight size and just size up using normal pattern gradation. The proportions very quickly become hilariously (or tragically) off. I have no window into the inner workings of the fashion world but my guess is that very few brands know how to replicate their styles at larger sizes because they don't study larger bodies and understand how the pattern grading has to be different.

Come over the to dark side of making your own clothes when possible! It's fun and we have sharp scissors to slice the patriarchy into shreds.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts